Cloud VPC VNet — 9 Network Patterns + Security | StarCloudIT
IPAM › Cloud VPC/VNet

Cloud VPC VNet — architecture, security and hybrid connectivity

Cloud VPC VNet is the network foundation for AWS/Azure/GCP: public/private subnets, peering, hub-and-spoke, Private Link/Endpoints, traffic control (SG/NSG, NACL/UDR) and hybrid connectivity (VPN, Direct Connect, ExpressRoute). We pair it with IPAM and IPv6 so addressing stays consistent, auditable and ready to scale.

Cloud VPC VNet — cloud networking, patch panels and connectivity
Segmentation and connectivity: from subnets to hybrid and VPC/VNet peering.

Why Cloud VPC VNet matters

Control

Boundaries and segmentation

Public/private zoning, route control, isolation of dev/test/prod and clear integration points.

Scale

Simple growth and DR

Reusable VPC/VNet templates per region/environment, easier DR and active/active between regions.

Cost

Smarter egress

Right-size NAT, endpoints and peering to reduce egress and gateway fees.

9 VPC/VNet architecture patterns

The most common layouts across AWS, Azure and GCP — with routing and security implications.

1. Public/Private + NAT

Private services use NAT Gateways; public services get ELB/ALB/NGINX with WAF.

2. Hub-and-Spoke

Central hub (firewall, NVA, TGW/VGW/ER) with isolated spokes per application domain.

3. Peering

Low-latency within a region/account; mind route limits and asymmetry.

4. Private Link/Endpoints

Traffic to SaaS/PaaS over private links, avoiding the public Internet.

5. Transit Gateway / vWAN

Scalable routing for many VPC/VNets; separate route domains.

6. Shared VPC/VNet

Shared network with delegated subnets for independent projects/subscriptions.

7. Application DMZ

Intermediate zone for B2B integrations and inbound traffic termination.

8. Multi-region

Replicate the pattern per region; route policies and split-horizon DNS.

9. Managed services

RDS/SQL/Storage behind private endpoints; control egress via FW/NAT.

Docs: AWS VPC, Azure Virtual Network, Google Cloud VPC.

Security: SG/NSG, NACL/UDR and firewalls

Security Groups / NSG

Stateful rules at interfaces; service labels and least-privilege access.

NACL / UDR

Stateless lists and routes; enforce paths via NVA/firewall and control lateral movement.

WAF and FWaaS

L7 protection (WAF) and central L3–L4 rules; SIEM logging and alerting.

Hybrid connectivity and multi-cloud

VPN and BGP

Site-to-site with redundancy, BGP for dynamic routes and fast reconvergence.

Direct Connect / ExpressRoute / Interconnect

Private links with predictable latency; watch egress and port fees.

HYB segmentation

Separate VRF/VNet for on‑prem and cloud; steer paths through the hub and inspection.

Addressing, IPv6 and IPAM in the cloud

Address plan

Prefix hierarchy (e.g., region/environment/domain), reservations and collision avoidance for peering/multi‑cloud.

  • Tag prefixes and subnets
  • Control drift and conflicts
  • Audited rollbacks

IPv6 from day one

/56–/64 delegations, strict route control, private endpoints and split‑horizon DNS under IPv6. IPAM keeps consistency and history.

Standards and guides: RFC 4291 (IPv6), Terraform, Ansible.

Automation and IaC for VPC/VNet

Landing Zone

VPC/VNet templates, policies, accounts/subscriptions and guardrails as code.

GitOps

Pull Request → validations (lint/test) → release; full change trail and SoD compliance.

Observability

Flow logs, route/NAT/endpoint metrics, SLO alerts for availability and latency.

Provider documentation and best practices

Links are dofollow so Rank Math can count them as outbound to reputable sources.

FAQ — Cloud VPC VNet

How do Security Groups differ from NACL/UDR?
SG/NSG are stateful rules at interfaces; NACL/UDR act statically at subnet/route level. We typically use both: SG for micro‑segmentation, NACL/UDR for steering paths.
Hub‑and‑Spoke or full peering?
Hub‑and‑Spoke scales better and simplifies central inspection; peering is simpler but gets hard to manage across many domains and regions.
How to reduce egress/NAT costs?
Prefer private endpoints (Private Link/Endpoints), aggregate NAT (policy‑based routing), caching and local service zones; minimize Internet egress.
IPv6 in the cloud — when is it worth it?
When address pressure and performance needs grow. An IPAM‑led plan (/64 delegations, split‑horizon DNS) simplifies connectivity and removes NAT.
Can this all be automated?
Yes — Landing Zone + Terraform/Ansible and GitOps (PR→validations→release), with auditing and SLO alerts.

Designing VPC/VNet across multiple regions or clouds?

Free 20‑minute consultation — get an architecture sketch, a security checklist and automation steps.